Path: Janda: Political Parties, Home Page > Part 1: Table of Contents > Chapter 15
Chapter 15: Continuity and Change: 1950-1978 (pp. 162-169), p. 167
(you can navigate to other pages by clicking on page numbers below)
p. 162
p. 163
p. 164
p. 165
p. 166
----
p. 168
p. 169

TABLE 15.10: Percentage Distribution of All Parties by Age and Fate
Party Age1

% of Parties
Percent of Parties Terminated
Total
(years)
N
Continuing
Voluntarily
Involuntarily
%
1-4
13
54
23
23
100
5-9
23
39
22
29
100
10-14
23
39
30
30
100
15-19
20
65
10
25
100
20-24
19
47
10
42
100
25-40
56
80
9
10
100
50-74
28
86
11
4
100
75-99
14
86
14

100
100-
12
100

100


1 In 1979 or at termination.

each age grouping. After parties reach 25, the probability of continuing jumps to 80 percent. When they terminate, moreover, parties more than 25 years old tend to end for voluntary rather than involuntary reasons. The only instance of a party older than 50 years ending involuntarily was the Cuban Liberal Party, which was terminated after the 1959 revolution. It is clear that party longevity, unlike human longevity, is associated with increased likelihood of continued survival. Of course, parties that endure for long periods of time enjoy more opportunities to fashion a comfortable environment to sustain them in their golden years.

One environmental factor directly related to party continuity is stability in number of parties in the system. Political science folklore holds that two-party systems are more stable than multiparty systems and that single-party systems supposedly have the greatest capacity for abrupt change. When viewed across all nations, the numbers of parties per system (reported in Table 15.11) show a slight trend since 1950 away from systems with two to four parties and toward the extremes of more than five and less than two parties. This observation may mask more information than it conveys, however, for one really wants to know which countries have experienced different party systems over time.

There are various ways of measuring party system instability (see Pederson 1980). For the purpose of this chapter, we employed a very simple measure, which differs from our measures of party instability in Chapter 3 (see BV 105 and BV 106). The percentage of seats held by a party in one year was subtracted from the percentage held in the next year. The absolute values of these differences for each pair of adjacent years from 1950 through 1978 were then summed over all 28 pairs to give a measure of aggregate change for each party. A party that held exactly the same percentage of seats in every year throughout the time period would show no changes and would receive a summed score of 0. Parties that fluctuated widely. in legislative representation would receive scores upward of 0, depending on the degree of fluctuation. These individual party scores can be aggregated into party system scores by summing the party scores across all the parties in the country. Dividing the result by 28 (the number of year-pairs involved in the calculation) yields a measure of the average percentage change in the distribution of party seats from

TABLE 15.11
Classification of All 53 Countries by Number of Parties per System during
Four Time Periods
No of Parties per System
1950-1956
1957-1962
1963-1970
1971-1978

None active

2
-
-
1

One

11
9
14
15

Two

13
13
11
10

Three

11
12
9
8

Four

10
8
8
7

Five

5
8
6
5

Six

-
1
1
3

Seven

1
1
2
1

Eight

-
-
-
2

Nine

-
-
1
-


Total

53
53
52a
52a


aThe Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland terminated in 1963, so the sample size decreased by one for the last two time periods.

go to page 168