|
1950
|
-5
|
THE RADICAL PARTY IS WELL
KNOWN FOR ITS ANTI-MILITARIST STANCE AND HAS
USED ITS INFLUENCE WHILE IN GOVERNING COALITIONS
TO KEEP DEFENSE SPENDING AT AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM.
THIS STRONG OPPOSITION TO DEFENSE SPENDING ENDED
IN 1960.
|
|
1951
|
-5
|
|
|
1952
|
-5
|
|
|
1953
|
-5
|
|
|
1954
|
-5
|
"In the 1954 economic crisis, therefore,
Hedtoft's government [SD] was forced to
turn to the Radicals and was prepared to pay the
price in the area of defense spending. An
agreement was reached between the two parties on
25 September 1954 and included a reduction in
conscript service time from 18 to 16 months as
well as a reduction in military construction and
the size of the annual call-ups..." (Einhorn,
1975, 50 - Patti Goff)
|
|
1955
|
-5
|
reference to "...the Radical party's goal of
non-aligned neutrality as an alternative to NATO
membership." (Einhorn, 1975, 47 - Patti
Goff)
|
|
1956
|
-5
|
|
|
1957
|
-5
|
|
|
1958
|
-5
|
|
|
1959
|
-5
|
|
|
1960
|
-5
|
"Hermod Lannung rose on behalf of the Radical
party and hinted at why his party had
participated in drafting the new defense law and
agreed to the five-party compromise. The
Radicals had sought to influence the form of the
new law before drafting was completed and most
of all, to prevent the stationing of nuclear
weapons or foreign troops on Danish territory.
In addition, the Radicals had been anxious to
keep defense expenditures as low as possible and
to reduce the length of conscript services. The
new law served these ends to some degree..."
(Einhorn, 1975, 72 - Patti Goff)
|
|
1961
|
-5
|
|
|
1962
|
-5
|
|
|
1963
|
-5
|
|
|
1964
|
-5
|
|
|
1965
|
-5
|
|
|
1966
|
-5
|
|
|
1967
|
-5
|
|
|
1968
|
-5
|
|
|
1969
|
-5
|
|
|
1970
|
-5
|
|
|
1971
|
-5
|
|
|
1972
|
-5
|
|
|
1973
|
-5
|
|
|
1974
|
-5
|
|
|
1975
|
-5
|
|
|
1976
|
-5
|
|
|
1977
|
-5
|
|
|
1978
|
-5
|
|
|
1979
|
-5
|
|
|
1980
|
-5
|
|
|
1981
|
-5
|
|
|
1982
|
-5
|
|
|
1983
|
-5
|
|
|
1984
|
-5
|
|
|
1985
|
-5
|
|
|
1986
|
-5
|
|
|
1987
|
-5
|
|
|
1988
|
-5
|
|
|
1989
|
-5
|
|
|
1990
|
-5
|
|
|