- Classical measurement theory assumes
that some True score (T) exists for the
concept being measured.
- Rarely, if ever, is T directly
observable.
- Instead, our Observed score
(O) composed of T and an Error
component (E):
- To the extent that we reduce
E, our observed score will converge on the true
score of the concept.
- Practical implications of this
assumption for research:
- All observations are
imperfect measures of a concept, due to two
types of error,
- random
- --observation errors for
individual cases are unknown but
offsetting
- --there is no bias in
estimating T from the mean
O
- systematic
- --observation errors are
unknown but not offsetting
- --there is bias in
estimating T from the mean
O
- Systematic error in measurement is
difficult to resolve
- resolution depends on the
theory and the problem
- measurement theory literature
offers few formulaic solutions
- Random error--the common
problem--is easier to handle
- The general approach is to use
multiple indicators (composite
measures)
- Sometimes these composite
measures are called a scale, sometimes an
index
|