IV. REMOVING GOVERNMENT AND INEFFICIENCY
One of my major commitments has been to restore public faith in our
Federal government by cutting out waste and inefficiency. In the past
four years, we have made dramatic advances toward this goal, many of
them previously considered impossible to achieve. Where government
rules and operations were unnecessary, they have been eliminated, as
with airline, rail, trucking and financial deregulation. Where
government functions are needed, they have been streamlined, through
such landmark measures as the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. I
hope that the new administration and the Congress will keep up the
momentum we have established for effective and responsible change in
this area of crucial public concern.
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
In March 1978, I submitted the Civil Service Reform Act to Congress.
I called it the centerpiece of my efforts to reform and reorganize
the government. With bipartisan support from Congress, the bill
passed, and I am pleased to say that implementation is running well
ahead of the statutory schedule. Throughout the service, we are
putting into place the means to assure that reward and retention are
based on performance and not simply on length of time on the job. In
the first real test of the Reform Act, 98 percent of the eligible
top-level managers joined the Senior Executive Service, choosing to
relinquish job protections for the challenge and potential reward of
this new corps of top executives. Though the Act does not require
several of its key elements to be in operation for another year, some
Federal agencies already have established merit pay systems for
GS-13-15 managers, and most agencies are well on their way to
establishing new performance standards for all their employees. All
have paid out, or are now in the process of paying out, performance
bonuses earned by outstanding members of the Senior Executive
Service. Dismissals have increased by 10 percent, and dismissals
specifically for inadequate job performance have risen 1500 percent,
since the Act was adopted. Finally, we have established a fully
independent Merit Systems Protection Board and Special Counsel to
protect the rights of whistle-blowers and other Federal employees
faced with threats to their rights.
In 1981, civil service reform faces critical challenges, all agencies
must have fully functioning performance appraisal systems for all
employees, and merit pay systems for compensating the government's
130,000 GS-13-15 managers. Performance bonuses for members of the
Senior Executive Service will surely receive scrutiny. If this
attention is balanced and constructive, it can only enhance the
chances for ultimate success of our bipartisan commitment to the
revolutionary and crucial "pay for performance" concept.
REGULATORY REFORM
During the past four years we have made tremendous progress in
regulatory reform. We have discarded old economic regulations that
prevented competition and raised consumer costs, and we have imposed
strong management principles on the regulatory programs the country
needs, cutting paperwork and other wasteful burdens. The challenge
for the future is to continue the progress in both areas without
crippling vital health and safety programs.
Our economic deregulation program has achieved major successes in
five areas:
Airlines: The Airline Deregulation Act is generating healthy
competition, saving billions in fares, and making the airlines more
efficient. The Act provides that in 1985 the CAB itself will go out
of existence.
Trucking: The trucking deregulation bill opens the industry to
competition and allows truckers wide latitude on the routes they
drive and the goods they haul. The bill also phases out most of the
old law's immunity for setting rates. The Congressional Budget Office
estimates these reforms will save as much as $8 billion per year and
cut as much as half a percentage point from the inflation rate.
Railroads: Overregulation has stifled railroad management initiative,
service, and competitive pricing. The new legislation gives the
railroads the freedom they need to rebuild a strong, efficient
railroad industry.
Financial Institutions: With the help of the Congress, over the past
four years we have achieved two major pieces of financial reform
legislation, legislation which has provided the basis for the most
far-reaching changes in the financial services industry since the
1930's. The International Banking Act of 1978 was designed to reduce
the advantages that foreign banks operating in the United States
possessed in comparison to domestic banks. The Depository
Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act, adopted last
March, provides for the phased elimination of a variety of
anti-competitive barriers to financial institutions and freedom to
offer services to and attract the savings of consumers, especially
small savers.
Recently, I submitted to the Congress my Administration's
recommendations for the phased liberalization of restrictions on
geographic expansion by commercial banks. Last year the
Administration and financial regulatory agencies proposed legislation
to permit the interstate acquisition of failing depository
institutions. In view of the difficult outlook for some depository
institutions I strongly urge the Congress to take prompt favorable
action on the failing bank legislation.
Telecommunications: While Congress did not pass legislation in this
area, the Federal Communications Commission has taken dramatic action
to open all aspects of communications to competition and to eliminate
regulations in the areas where competition made them obsolete. The
public is benefitting from an explosion of competition and new
services.
While these initiatives represent dramatic progress in economic
deregulation, continued work is needed. I urge Congress to act on
communications legislation and to consider other proposed
deregulation measures, such as legislation on the bus industry. In
addition, the regulatory commissions must maintain their commitment
to competition as the best regulator of all.
The other part of my reform program covers the regulations that are
needed to protect the health, safety, and welfare of our citizens.
For these regulations, my Administration has created a management
program to cut costs without sacrificing goals. Under my Executive
Order 12044, we required agencies to analyze the costs of their major
new rules and consider alternative approaches, such as performance
standards and voluntary codes, that may make rules less costly and
more flexible. We created the Regulatory Analysis Review Group in the
White House to analyze the most costly proposed new rules and find
ways to improve them. The Regulatory Council was established to
provide the first Government-wide listing of upcoming rules and
eliminate overlapping and conflicting regulations. Agencies have
launched "sunset" programs to weed out outmoded old regulations. We
have acted to encourage public participation in regulatory
decision-making.
These steps have already saved billions of dollars in regulatory
costs and slashed thousands of outmoded regulations. We are moving
steadily toward a regulatory system that provides needed protections
fairly, predictably, and at minimum cost.
I urge Congress to continue on this steady path and resist the
simplistic solutions that have been proposed as alternatives.
Proposals like legislative veto and increased judicial review will
add another layer to the regulatory process, making it more
cumbersome and inefficient. The right approach to reform is to
improve the individual statutes, where they need change, and to
ensure that the regulatory agencies implement those statutes
sensibly.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION
The Federal Government imposes a huge paperwork burden on business,
local government, and the private sector. Many of these forms are
needed for vital government functions, but others are duplicative,
overly complex or obsolete.
During my Administration we cut the paperwork burden by 15 percent,
and we created procedures to continue this progress. The new
Paperwork Reduction Act centralizes, in OMB, oversight of all
agencies' information requirements and strengthens OMB's authority to
eliminate needless forms. The "paperwork budget" process, which I
established by executive order, applies the discipline of the budget
process to the hours of reporting time imposed on the public, forcing
agencies to scrutinize all their forms each year. With effective
implementation, these steps should allow further, substantial
paperwork cuts in the years ahead.
TIGHTENING STANDARDS FOR GOVERNMENTAL EFFICIENCY AND
INTEGRITY
To develop a foundation to carry out energy policy, we consolidated
scattered energy programs and launched the Synthetic Fuels
Corporation; to give education the priority it deserves and at the
same time reduce HHS to more manageable size, I gave education a seat
at the Cabinet table, to create a stronger system for attacking waste
and fraud, I reorganized audit and investigative functions by putting
an Inspector General in major agencies. Since I took office, we have
submitted 14 reorganization initiatives and had them all approved by
Congress. We have saved hundreds of millions of dollars through the
adoption of businesslike cash management principles and set strict
standards for personal financial disclosure and conflict of interest
avoidance by high Federal officials.
To streamline the structure of the government, we have secured
approval of 14 reorganization initiatives, improving the efficiency
of the most important sectors of the government, including energy,
education, and civil rights enforcement. We have eliminated more than
300 advisory committees as well as other agencies, boards and
commissions which were obsolete or ineffective. Independent
Inspectors General have been appointed in major agencies to attack
fraud and waste. More than a billion dollars of questionable
transactions have been identified through their audit activities.
The adoption of business-like cash management and debt collection
initiatives will save over $1 billion, by streamlining the processing
of receipts, by controlling disbursements more carefully, and by
reducing idle cash balances. Finally this Administration has set
strict standards for personal financial disclosure and conflict of
interest avoidance by high Federal officials, to elevate the level of
public trust in the government.
V. PROTECTING BASIC RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
I am extremely proud of the advances we have made in ensuring
equality and protecting the basic freedoms of all Americans.
* The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Office
of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) have been reorganized and
strengthened and a permanent civil rights unit has been established
in OMB.
* To avoid fragmented, inconsistent and duplicative enforcement of
civil rights laws, three agencies have been given coordinative and
standard-setting responsibilities in discrete areas: EEOC for all
employment-related activities, HUD for all those relating to housing,
and the Department of Justice for all other areas.
* With the enactment of the Right to Financial Privacy Act and a bill
limiting police search of newsrooms, we have begun to establish a
sound, comprehensive, privacy program.
Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment must be aggressively
pursued. Only one year remains in which to obtain ratification by
three additional states.
The Congress must give early attention to a number of important bills
which remain. These bills would:
* strengthen the laws against discrimination in housing. Until it is
enacted, the 1968 Civil Rights Act's promise of equal access to
housing will remain unfulfilled;
* establish a charter for the FBI and the intelligence agencies. The
failure to define in law the duties and responsibilities of these
agencies has made possible some of the abuses which have occurred in
recent years;
* establish privacy safeguards for medical research, bank, insurance,
and credit records; and provide special protection for election fund
transfer systems.
EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT
I remain committed as strongly as possible to the ratification of the
Equal Rights Amendment.
As a result of our efforts in 1978, the Equal Rights Amendment's
deadline for ratification was extended for three years. We have now
one year and three States left. We cannot afford any delay in
marshalling our resources and efforts to obtain the ratification of
those three additional States.
Although the Congress has no official role in the ratification
process at this point, you do have the ability to affect public
opinion and the support of State Legislators for the Amendment. I
urge Members from States which have not yet ratified the Equal Rights
Amendment to use their influence to secure ratification. I will
continue my own efforts to help ensure ratification of the Equal
Rights Amendment.
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. led this Nation's effort to provide all
its citizens with civil rights and equal opportunities. His
commitment to human rights, peace and non-violence stands as a
monument to his humanity and courage. As one of our Nation's most
outstanding leaders, it is appropriate that his birthday be
commemorated as a national holiday. I hope the Congress will enact
legislation this year that will achieve this goal.
FAIR HOUSING
The Fair Housing Act Amendments of 1980 passed the House of
Representatives by an overwhelming bipartisan majority only to die in
the Senate at the close of the 96th Congress. The leaders of both
parties have pledged to make the enactment of fair housing
legislation a top priority of the incoming Congress. The need is
pressing and a strengthened federal enforcement effort must be the
primary method of resolution.
CRIMINAL CODE
The Federal criminal laws are often archaic, frequently contradictory
and imprecise, and clearly in need of revision and codification. The
new Administration should continue the work which has been begun to
develop a Federal criminal code which simplifies and clarifies our
criminal laws, while maintaining our basic civil liberties and
protections.
PRIVACY
As our public and private institutions collect more and more
information and as communications and computer technologies advance,
we must act to protect the personal privacy of our citizens.
In the past four years we acted on the report of the Privacy
Commission and established a national privacy policy. We worked with
Congress to pass legislation restricting wiretaps and law enforcement
access to bank records and to reporters' files. We reduced the number
of personal files held by the government and restricted the transfer
of personal information among Federal agencies. We also worked with
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to
establish international guidelines to protect the privacy of personal
information that is transferred across borders.
VI. PROTECTING AND DEVELOPING OUR NATURAL RESOURCES
Two of our Nation's most precious natural resources are our
environment and our vast agricultural capacity. From the beginning of
my Administration, I have worked with the Congress to enhance and
protect, as well as develop our natural resources. In the
environmental areas, I have been especially concerned about the
importance of balancing the need for resource development with
preserving a clean environment, and have taken numerous actions to
foster this goal. In the agricultural area, I have taken the steps
needed to improve farm incomes and to increase our agricultural
production to record levels. That progress must be continued in the
1980's.
ENVIRONMENT
Preserving the quality of our environment has been among the most
important objectives of my Administration and of the Congress. As a
result of these shared commitments and the dedicated efforts of many
members of the Congress and my Administration, we have achieved
several historic accomplishments.
PROTECTION OF ALASKA LANDS
Passage of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act was
one of the most important conservation actions of this century. At
stake was the fate of millions of acres of beautiful land,
outstanding and unique wildlife populations, native cultures, and the
opportunity to ensure that future generations of Americans would be
able to enjoy the benefits of these nationally significant resources.
As a result of the leadership, commitment, and persistence of my
Administration and the Congressional leadership, the Alaska Lands
Bill was signed into law last December.
The Act adds 97 million acres of new parks and refuges, more than
doubling the size of our National Park and National Wildlife Refuge
Systems. The bill triples the size of our national wilderness system,
increasing its size by 56 million acres. And by adding 25
free-flowing river segments to the Wild and Scenic River System, the
bill almost doubles the river mileage in that system. The Alaska
Lands Act reaffirms our commitment to the environment and strikes a
balance between protecting areas of great beauty and allowing
development of Alaska's oil, gas, mineral, and timber resources.
PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
In addition to the Alaska Lands Act, over the past four years we have
been able to expand significantly the national wilderness and parks
systems. In 1978, the Congress passed the historical Omnibus Parks
Act, which made 12 additions to the National Park System. The Act
also established the first two national trails since the National
Trails System Act was passed in 1968. Then, in 1980, as a result of
my 1979Environmental Message, the Federal land management agencies
have established almost 300 new National Recreational Trails. With
the completion of the RARE II process, which eliminated the
uncertainty surrounding the status of millions of acres of land, we
called for over 15 million acres of new wilderness in the nation's
National Forest, in 1980 the Congress established about 4.5 million
acres of wilderness in the lower 48 states. In addition, the
Administration recommended legislation to protect Lake Tahoe, and
through an Executive Order has already established a mechanism to
help ensure the Lake's protection. Finally, in 1980 the
Administration established the Channel Islands Marine Sanctuary.
Administration actions over the past four years stressed the
importance of providing Federal support only for water resource
projects that are economically and environmentally sound. This policy
should have a major and lasting influence on the federal government's
role in water resource development and management. The
Administration's actions to recommend to the Congress only
economically and environmentally sound water resource projects for
funding resulted not only in our opposing uneconomic projects but
also, in 1979, in the first Administration proposal of new project
starts in 4 years.
One of the most significant water policy actions of the past four
years was the Administration's June 6, 1978 Water Policy Reform
Message to the Congress. This Message established a new national
water resources policy with the following objectives:
* to give priority emphasis to water conservation;
* to consider environmental requirements and values more fully and
along with economic factors in the planning and management of water
projects and programs;
* to enhance cooperation between state and federal agencies in water
resources planning and management.
In addition, the Executive Office of the President established 11
policy decision criteria to evaluate the proposed federal water
projects, the Water Resources Council developed and adopted a new set
of Principles and Standards for water projects which is binding on
all federal construction agencies, and improved regulations were
developed to implement the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. As a result, water resource
projects must be determined to be economically sound before the
Administration will recommend authorization or appropriation. Over
the years ahead, this policy will help to reduce wasteful federal
spending by targeting federal funds to the highest priority water
resource projects.
In the pursuit of this policy, however, we cannot lose projects. In
the part that sound water resource projects play in providing
irrigation, power, and flood control. We must also recognize the
special needs of particular regions of the country in evaluating the
need for additional projects.
ADDRESSING GLOBAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
The Global 2000 Report to the President, prepared in response to my
1977 Environment Message, is the first of its kind. Never before has
our government, or any government, taken such a comprehensive,
long-range look at the interrelated global issues of resources,
population, and environment.
The Report's conclusions are important. They point to a rapid
increase in population and human needs through the year 2000 while at
the same time a decline in the earth's capacity to meet those needs,
unless nations of the world act decisively to alter current
trends.
The United States has contributed actively to a series of U.N.
conferences on the environment, population, and resources, and is
preparing for the 1981 Conference on New and Renewable Sources of
Energy. Following my 1977 Environmental Message, the Administration
development assistance programs have added emphasis to natural
resource management and environmental protection. My 1979
Environmental Message called attention to the alarming loss of world
forests, particularly in the tropics. An interagency task force on
tropical forests has developed a U.S. government program to encourage
conservation and wise management of tropical forests. The
Administration is encouraging action by other nations and world
organizations to the same purpose. The United States is a world
leader in wildlife conservation and the assessment of environmental
effects of government actions. The January 5, 1979, Executive Order
directing U.S. government agencies to consider the effects of their
major actions abroad, is another example of this leadership.
COMMITMENT TO CONTROL OF POLLUTION AND HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS
Over the past four years, there has been steady progress towards
cleaner air and water, sustained by the commitment of Congress and
the Administration to these important national objectives. In
addition, the Administration has developed several new pollution
compliance approaches such as alternative and innovative waste water
treatment projects, the "bubble" concept, the "offset" policy, and
permit consolidation, all of which are designed to reduce regulatory
burdens on the private sector.
One of the most pressing problems to come to light in the past four
years has been improper hazardous waste disposal. The Administration
has moved on three fronts. First, we proposed the Oil Hazardous
Substances and Hazardous Waste Response, Liability and Compensation
Act (the Superfund bill) to provide comprehensive authority and $1.6
billion in funds to clean up abandoned hazardous waste disposal
sites. In November 1980 the Congress passed a Superfund bill which I
signed into law.
Second, the administration established a hazardous waste enforcement
strike force to ensure that when available, responsible parties are
required to clean up sites posing dangers to public health and to the
environment. To date, 50 lawsuits have been brought by the strike
force.
Third, regulations implementing subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act were issued. The regulations establish
comprehensive controls for hazardous waste and, together with
vigorous enforcement, will help to ensure that Love Canal will not be
repeated.
THE FUTURE
For the future, we cannot,and we must not, forget that we are charged
with the stewardship of an irreplaceable environment and natural
heritage. Our children, and our children's children, are dependent
upon our maintaining our commitment to preserving and enhancing the
quality of our environment. It is my hope that when our descendants
look back on the 1980's they will be able to affirm:
* that we kept our commitment to the restoration of environmental
quality;
* that we protected the public health from the continuing dangers of
toxic chemicals, from pollution, from hazardous and radioactive
waste, and that we made our communities safer, healthier and better
places to live;
* that we preserved America's wilderness areas and particularly its
last great frontier, Alaska, for the benefit of all Americans in
perpetuity;
* that we put this nation on a path to a sustainable energy future,
one based increasingly on renewable resources and on energy
conservation;
* that we moved to protect America's countryside and coastland from
mismanagement and irresponsibility;
* that we redirected the management of the nation's water resources
toward water conservation, sound development and environmental
protection;
* that we faced squarely such worldwide problems as the destruction
of forests, acid rain, carbon dioxide build-up and nuclear
proliferation; and
* that we protected the habitat and the existence of our own species
on this earth.
AGRICULTURE: THE FARM ECONOMY
The farm economy is sound and its future is bright. Agriculture
remains a major bulwark of the nation's economy and an even more
important factor in the world food system. The demand for America's
agricultural abundance, here and abroad, continues to grow. In the
near-term, the strength of this demand is expected to press hard
against supplies, resulting in continued price strength.
The health and vitality of current-day agriculture represents a
significant departure from the situation that existed when I came to
office four years ago. In January 1977, the farm economy was in
serious trouble. Farm prices and farm income were falling rapidly.
Grain prices were at their lowest levels in years and steadily
falling. Livestock producers, in their fourth straight year of record
losses, were liquidating breeding herds at an unparalleled rate.
Dairy farmers were losing money on every hundredweight of milk they
produced. Sugar prices were in a nosedive.
Through a combination of improvements in old, established programs
and the adoption of new approaches where innovation and change were
needed, my Administration turned this situation around. Commodity
prices have steadily risen. Farm income turned upward. U.S. farm
exports set new records each year, increasing over 80 percent for the
four year period. Livestock producers began rebuilding their herds.
Dairy farmers began to earn a profit again.
RECENT POLICY INITIATIVES
Several major agricultural policy initiatives have been undertaken
over the past year. Some are the culmination of policy proposals made
earlier in this Administration; others are measures taken to help
farmers offset the impact of rapid inflation in production costs. In
combination, they represent a significant strengthening of our
nation's food and agricultural policy. These initiatives include:
FOOD SECURITY RESERVE
The Congress authorized formation of a 4 million ton food grain
reserve for use in international food assistance. This reserve makes
it possible for the United States to stand behind its food aid
commitment to food deficit nations, even during periods of short
supplies and high prices. This corrects a serious fault in our past
food assistance policy.
COMPREHENSIVE CROP INSURANCE
The Congress also authorized a significant new crop insurance program
during 1980. This measure provides farmers with an important new
program tool for sharing the economic risks that are inherent to
agriculture. When fully operational, it will replace a hodgepodge of
disaster programs that suffered from numerous shortcomings.
SPECIAL LOAN RATES
Another legislative measure passed late in the 2nd session of the
96th Congress authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to provide
higher loan rates to farmers who enter their grain in the
farmer-owned grain reserve. This additional incentive to participate
will further strengthen the reserve.
INCREASED LOAN PRICES
In July 1980, I administratively raised loan prices for wheat,
feedgrains, and soybeans to help offset the effects of a serious
cost-price squeeze. At the same time, the release and call prices for
the grain reserve were adjusted upward.
HIGHER TARGET PRICES
The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1980 raised the target prices for
1980-crop wheat and feed grain crops. This change corrected for
shortcomings in the adjustment formula contained in the Food and
Agriculture Act of 1977.
FUTURE AGENDA
The food and agricultural policies adopted by this Administration
over the past four years, including those described above, will
provide a firm foundation for future governmental actions in this
field. Expiration of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 later this
year will require early attention by the Congress. With relatively
minor changes, most of the authorities contained in the 1977 Act
should be extended in their present form. The farmer-owned grain
reserve has proven to be a particularly effective means of
stabilizing grain markets and should be preserved in essentially its
present form.
Beyond this, it will be important for the Congress to keep a close
eye on price-cost developments in the farm sector. As noted above,
some of the actions I took last year were for the purpose of
providing relief from the cost-price squeeze facing farmers. Should
these pressures continue, further actions might be required.
My Administration has devoted particular attention to the issues of
world hunger, agricultural land use, and the future structure of
American agriculture. I encourage the Congress and the next
Administration to review the results of these landmark enquiries and,
where deemed appropriate, to act on their recommendations.
Following a careful review of the situation, I recently extended the
suspension of grain sales to the Soviet Union. I am satisfied that
this action has served its purpose effectively and fairly. However,
as long as this suspension must remain in effect, it will be
important for the next Administration and the Congress to take
whatever actions are necessary to ensure that the burden does not
fall unfairly on our Nation's farmers. This has been a key feature of
my Administration's policy, and it should be maintained.