Go back to All
Presidents 2,823 words
Fellow-Citizens: I appear before you this day to take the solemn oath
"that I will faithfully execute the office of President of
the United States and will to the best of my ability
preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United
States." In entering upon this great office I must humbly invoke
the God of our fathers for wisdom and firmness to execute
its high and responsible duties in such a manner as to
restore harmony and ancient friendship among the people of
the several States and to preserve our free institutions
throughout many generations. Convinced that I owe my
election to the inherent love for the Constitution and the
Union which still animates the hearts of the American
people, let me earnestly ask their powerful support in
sustaining all just measures calculated to perpetuate these,
the richest political blessings which Heaven has ever
bestowed upon any nation. Having determined not to become a
candidate for reelection, I shall have no motive to
influence my conduct in administering the Government except
the desire ably and faithfully to serve my country and to
live in grateful memory of my countrymen. We have recently passed through a Presidential contest in
which the passions of our fellow-citizens were excited to
the highest degree by questions of deep and vital
importance; but when the people proclaimed their will the
tempest at once subsided and all was calm. The voice of the majority, speaking in the manner
prescribed by the Constitution, was heard, and instant
submission followed. Our own country could alone have
exhibited so grand and striking a spectacle of the capacity
of man for self-government. What a happy conception, then, was it for Congress to
apply this simple rule, that the will of the majority shall
govern, to the settlement of the question of domestic
slavery in the Territories. Congress is neither "to
legislate slavery into any Territory or State nor to exclude
it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free
to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their
own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United
States." As a natural consequence, Congress has also prescribed
that when the Territory of Kansas shall be admitted as a
State it "shall be received into the Union with or without
slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of
their admission." A difference of opinion has arisen in regard to the point
of time when the people of a Territory shall decide this
question for themselves. This is, happily, a matter of but little practical
importance. Besides, it is a judicial question, which
legitimately belongs to the Supreme Court of the United
States, before whom it is now pending, and will, it is
understood, be speedily and finally settled. To their
decision, in common with all good citizens, I shall
cheerfully submit, whatever this may be, though it has ever
been my individual opinion that under the Nebraska-Kansas
act the appropriate period will be when the number of actual
residents in the Territory shall justify the formation of a
constitution with a view to its admission as a State into
the Union. But be this as it may, it is the imperative and
indispensable duty of the Government of the United States to
secure to every resident inhabitant the free and independent
expression of his opinion by his vote. This sacred right of
each individual must be preserved. That being accomplished,
nothing can be fairer than to leave the people of a
Territory free from all foreign interference to decide their
own destiny for themselves, subject only to the Constitution
of the United States. The whole Territorial question being thus settled upon
the principle of popular sovereignty--a principle as ancient
as free government itself--everything of a practical nature
has been decided. No other question remains for adjustment,
because all agree that under the Constitution slavery in the
States is beyond the reach of any human power except that of
the respective States themselves wherein it exists. May we
not, then, hope that the long agitation on this subject is
approaching its end, and that the geographical parties to
which it has given birth, so much dreaded by the Father of
his Country, will speedily become extinct? Most happy will
it be for the country when the public mind shall be diverted
from this question to others of more pressing and practical
importance. Throughout the whole progress of this agitation,
which has scarcely known any intermission for more than
twenty years, whilst it has been productive of no positive
good to any human being it has been the prolific source of
great evils to the master, to the slave, and to the whole
country. It has alienated and estranged the people of the
sister States from each other, and has even seriously
endangered the very existence of the Union. Nor has the
danger yet entirely ceased. Under our system there is a
remedy for all mere political evils in the sound sense and
sober judgment of the people. Time is a great corrective.
Political subjects which but a few years ago excited and
exasperated the public mind have passed away and are now
nearly forgotten. But this question of domestic slavery is
of far graver importance than any mere political question,
because should the agitation continue it may eventually
endanger the personal safety of a large portion of our
countrymen where the institution exists. In that event no
form of government, however admirable in itself and however
productive of material benefits, can compensate for the loss
of peace and domestic security around the family altar. Let
every Union-loving man, therefore, exert his best influence
to suppress this agitation, which since the recent
legislation of Congress is without any legitimate
object. It is an evil omen of the times that men have undertaken
to calculate the mere material value of the Union. Reasoned
estimates have been presented of the pecuniary profits and
local advantages which would result to different States and
sections from its dissolution and of the comparative
injuries which such an event would inflict on other States
and sections. Even descending to this low and narrow view of
the mighty question, all such calculations are at fault. The
bare reference to a single consideration will be conclusive
on this point. We at present enjoy a free trade throughout
our extensive and expanding country such as the world has
never witnessed. This trade is conducted on railroads and
canals, on noble rivers and arms of the sea, which bind
together the North and the South, the East and the West, of
our Confederacy. Annihilate this trade, arrest its free
progress by the geographical lines of jealous and hostile
States, and you destroy the prosperity and onward march of
the whole and every part and involve all in one common ruin.
But such considerations, important as they are in
themselves, sink into insignificance when we reflect on the
terrific evils which would result from disunion to every
portion of the Confederacy--to the North, not more than to
the South, to the East not more than to the West. These I
shall not attempt to portray, because I feel an humble
confidence that the kind Providence which inspired our
fathers with wisdom to frame the most perfect form of
government and union ever devised by man will not suffer it
to perish until it shall have been peacefully instrumental
by its example in the extension of civil and religious
liberty throughout the world. Next in importance to the maintenance of the Constitution
and the Union is the duty of preserving the Government free
from the taint or even the suspicion of corruption. Public
virtue is the vital spirit of republics, and history proves
that when this has decayed and the love of money has usurped
its place, although the forms of free government may remain
for a season, the substance has departed forever. Our present financial condition is without a parallel in
history. No nation has ever before been embarrassed from too
large a surplus in its treasury. This almost necessarily
gives birth to extravagant legislation. It produces wild
schemes of expenditure and begets a race of speculators and
jobbers, whose ingenuity is exerted in contriving and
promoting expedients to obtain public money. The purity of
official agents, whether rightfully or wrongfully, is
suspected, and the character of the government suffers in
the estimation of the people. This is in itself a very great
evil. The natural mode of relief from this embarrassment is to
appropriate the surplus in the Treasury to great national
objects for which a clear warrant can be found in the
Constitution. Among these I might mention the extinguishment
of the public debt, a reasonable increase of the Navy, which
is at present inadequate to the protection of our vast
tonnage afloat, now greater than that of any other nation,
as well as to the defense of our extended seacoast. It is beyond all question the true principle that no more
revenue ought to be collected from the people than the
amount necessary to defray the expenses of a wise,
economical, and efficient administration of the Government.
To reach this point it was necessary to resort to a
modification of the tariff, and this has, I trust, been
accomplished in such a manner as to do as little injury as
may have been practicable to our domestic manufactures,
especially those necessary for the defense of the country.
Any discrimination against a particular branch for the
purpose of benefiting favored corporations, individuals, or
interests would have been unjust to the rest of the
community and inconsistent with that spirit of fairness and
equality which ought to govern in the adjustment of a
revenue tariff. But the squandering of the public money sinks into
comparative insignificance as a temptation to corruption
when compared with the squandering of the public lands. No nation in the tide of time has ever been blessed with
so rich and noble an inheritance as we enjoy in the public
lands. In administering this important trust, whilst it may
be wise to grant portions of them for the improvement of the
remainder, yet we should never forget that it is our
cardinal policy to reserve these lands, as much as may be,
for actual settlers, and this at moderate prices. We shall
thus not only best promote the prosperity of the new States
and Territories, by furnishing them a hardy and independent
race of honest and industrious citizens, but shall secure
homes for our children and our children's children, as well
as for those exiles from foreign shores who may seek in this
country to improve their condition and to enjoy the
blessings of civil and religious liberty. Such emigrants
have done much to promote the growth and prosperity of the
country. They have proved faithful both in peace and in war.
After becoming citizens they are entitled, under the
Constitution and laws, to be placed on a perfect equality
with native-born citizens, and in this character they should
ever be kindly recognized. The Federal Constitution is a grant from the States to
Congress of certain specific powers, and the question
whether this grant should be liberally or strictly construed
has more or less divided political parties from the
beginning. Without entering into the argument, I desire to
state at the commencement of my Administration that long
experience and observation have convinced me that a strict
construction of the powers of the Government is the only
true, as well as the only safe, theory of the Constitution.
Whenever in our past history doubtful powers have been
exercised by Congress, these have never failed to produce
injurious and unhappy consequences. Many such instances
might be adduced if this were the proper occasion. Neither
is it necessary for the public service to strain the
language of the Constitution, because all the great and
useful powers required for a successful administration of
the Government, both in peace and in war, have been granted,
either in express terms or by the plainest implication. Whilst deeply convinced of these truths, I yet consider
it clear that under the war-making power Congress may
appropriate money toward the construction of a military road
when this is absolutely necessary for the defense of any
State or Territory of the Union against foreign invasion.
Under the Constitution Congress has power "to declare war,"
"to raise and support armies," "to provide and maintain a
navy," and to call forth the militia to "repel invasions."
Thus endowed, in an ample manner, with the war-making power,
the corresponding duty is required that "the United States
shall protect each of them [the States] against
invasion." Now, how is it possible to afford this protection
to California and our Pacific possessions except by means of
a military road through the Territories of the United
States, over which men and munitions of war may be speedily
transported from the Atlantic States to meet and to repel
the invader? In the event of a war with a naval power much
stronger than our own we should then have no other available
access to the Pacific Coast, because such a power would
instantly close the route across the isthmus of Central
America. It is impossible to conceive that whilst the
Constitution has expressly required Congress to defend all
the States it should yet deny to them, by any fair
construction, the only possible means by which one of these
States can be defended. Besides, the Government, ever since
its origin, has been in the constant practice of
constructing military roads. It might also be wise to
consider whether the love for the Union which now animates
our fellow-citizens on the Pacific Coast may not be impaired
by our neglect or refusal to provide for them, in their
remote and isolated condition, the only means by which the
power of the States on this side of the Rocky Mountains can
reach them in sufficient time to "protect" them "against
invasion." I forbear for the present from expressing an
opinion as to the wisest and most economical mode in which
the Government can lend its aid in accomplishing this great
and necessary work. I believe that many of the difficulties
in the way, which now appear formidable, will in a great
degree vanish as soon as the nearest and best route shall
have been satisfactorily ascertained. It may be proper that on this occasion I should make some
brief remarks in regard to our rights and duties as a member
of the great family of nations. In our intercourse with them
there are some plain principles, approved by our own
experience, from which we should never depart. We ought to
cultivate peace, commerce, and friendship with all nations,
and this not merely as the best means of promoting our own
material interests, but in a spirit of Christian benevolence
toward our fellow-men, wherever their lot may be cast. Our
diplomacy should be direct and frank, neither seeking to
obtain more nor accepting less than is our due. We ought to
cherish a sacred regard for the independence of all nations,
and never attempt to interfere in the domestic concerns of
any unless this shall be imperatively required by the great
law of self-preservation. To avoid entangling alliances has
been a maxim of our policy ever since the days of
Washington, and its wisdom's no one will attempt to dispute.
In short, we ought to do justice in a kindly spirit to all
nations and require justice from them in return. It is our glory that whilst other nations have extended
their dominions by the sword we have never acquired any
territory except by fair purchase or, as in the case of
Texas, by the voluntary determination of a brave, kindred,
and independent people to blend their destinies with our
own. Even our acquisitions from Mexico form no exception.
Unwilling to take advantage of the fortune of war against a
sister republic, we purchased these possessions under the
treaty of peace for a sum which was considered at the time a
fair equivalent. Our past history forbids that we shall in
the future acquire territory unless this be sanctioned by
the laws of justice and honor. Acting on this principle, no
nation will have a right to interfere or to complain if in
the progress of events we shall still further extend our
possessions. Hitherto in all our acquisitions the people,
under the protection of the American flag, have enjoyed
civil and religious liberty, as well as equal and just laws,
and have been contented, prosperous, and happy. Their trade
with the rest of the world has rapidly increased, and thus
every commercial nation has shared largely in their
successful progress. I shall now proceed to take the oath prescribed by the
Constitution, whilst humbly invoking the blessing of Divine
Providence on this great people.
March 4, 1857
The Democratic Party chose another candidate instead of
their incumbent President when they nominated James Buchanan at the
national convention. Since the Jackson Administration, he had a
distinguished career as a Senator, Congressman, Cabinet officer, and
ambassador. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice
Roger Taney on the East Portico of the Capitol. A parade had preceded
the ceremony at the Capitol, and an inaugural ball was held that
evening for 6,000 celebrants in a specially built hall on Judiciary
Square.