|
FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS Go here for original web site and full report |
|
AMERICA'S NEW INTERNATIONALIST POINT OF VIEW The terrorist attacks and the war in Afghanistan have created a new internationalist sentiment among the public. There is much more support for a multilateral foreign policy than before Sept.11, with roughly six-in-ten (59%) now saying that the interests of allies should be taken into account by U.S. policymakers. By about a two-to-one margin (61%-32%) the public thinks that taking an active role in the world, rather than becoming less involved, will be a more effective way of avoiding problems like terrorism in the future. And support for assertive U.S. leadership also has grown, with as many as 45% saying that the United States should either be the single world leader or at least be the most active of leading nations. |
|
ABOUT THIS SURVEY Results for the America's Place In The World Callback survey are based on telephone interviews conducted under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates among a sample of 1,281 adults who were interviewed for the original America's Place In The World Survey (August 21 - September 5, 2001 N=2,002). These re-interviews were conducted during the period October 15-21, 2001. For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other random effects is plus or minus 3 percentage points. For results based on either Form 1 (N=638) or Form 2 (N=643), the sampling error is plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. AMERICA'S PLACE IN THE WORLD METHODOLOGY IN DETAIL The Call Back Survey For the callback, at least 10 attempts were made to complete an interview with every respondent in the original survey. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the week to maximize the chances of making a contact with a respondent. All interview breakoffs and refusals were re-contacted at least once in order to attempt to convert them to completed interviews. Non-response in telephone interview surveys produces some known biases in survey-derived estimates because participation tends to vary for different subgroups of the population, and these subgroups are likely to vary also on questions of substantive interest. In order to compensate for these known biases, the sample data are weighted in analysis. The demographic weighting parameters are derived from a special analysis of the most recently available Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (March 2000). This analysis produced population parameters for the demographic characteristics of households with adults 18 or older, which are then compared with the sample characteristics to construct sample weights. The analysis only included households in the continental United States that contain a telephone. The weights are derived using an iterative technique that simultaneously balances the distributions of all weighting parameters. The Original Survey The sample for the original survey is a random digit sample of telephone numbers selected from telephone exchanges in the continental United States. The random digit aspect of the sample is used to avoid "listing" bias and provides representation of both listed and unlisted numbers (including not-yet-listed). The design of the sample ensures this representation by random generation of the last two digits of telephone numbers selected on the basis of their area code, telephone exchange, and bank number. The telephone exchanges were selected with probabilities proportional to their size. The first eight digits of the sampled telephone numbers (area code, telephone exchange, bank number) were selected to be proportionally stratified by county and by telephone exchange within county. That is, the number of telephone numbers randomly sampled from within a given county is proportional to that county's share of telephone numbers in the U.S. Only working banks of telephone numbers are selected. A working bank is defined as 100 contiguous telephone numbers containing one or more residential listings. The sample was released for interviewing in replicates. Using replicates to control the release of sample to the field ensures that the complete call procedures are followed for the entire sample. The use of replicates also insures that the regional distribution of numbers called is appropriate. Again, this works to increase the representativeness of the sample. At least 10 attempts were made to complete an interview at every sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the week to maximize the chances of making a contact with a potential respondent. All interview breakoffs and refusals were re-contacted at least once in order to attempt to convert them to completed interviews. In each contacted household, interviewers asked to speak with the "youngest male 18 or older who is at home." If there is no eligible man at home, interviewers asked to speak with "the oldest woman 18 or older who is at home." This systematic respondent selection technique has been shown empirically to produce samples that closely mirror the population in terms of age and gender. Non-response in telephone interview surveys produces some known biases in survey-derived estimates because participation tends to vary for different subgroups of the population, and these subgroups are likely to vary also on questions of substantive interest. In order to compensate for these known biases, the sample data are weighted in analysis. The demographic weighting parameters are derived from a special analysis of the most recently available Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (March 2000). This analysis produced population parameters for the demographic characteristics of households with adults 18 or older, which are then compared with the sample characteristics to construct sample weights. The analysis only included households in the continental United States that contain a telephone. The weights are derived using an iterative technique that simultaneously balances the distributions of all weighting parameters. |
|
Questions Asked in the Survey and Response Marginals |
PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS & COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AMERICA'S PLACE IN THE WORLD, III GENERAL PUBLIC CALLBACK TOPLINE OCT 15-21, 2001 N = 1,281 All in all, Q.1 What kind of leadership role should the United States play in the world? Should it be the single world leader, or should it play a shared leadership role, or shouldn't it play any leadership role? IF ANSWERED 2 "SHARED LEADERSHIP ROLE" IN Q.1, ASK: Q.2 Should the United States be the most active of the leading nations, or should it be about as active as other leading nations? Early Sept Sept June Oct Sept 2001 1997 1995 1993 1993 12 Be the single world leader, or 13 12 13 9 10 79 Should it play a shared leadership role 75 73 74 78 81 33 Most active 25 22 25 23 27 45 About as active 49 50 47 53 52 1 Don't know/Refused 1 1 2 2 2 3 Shouldn't it play any leadership role 8 11 9 9 7 6 Don't know/Refused 4 4 4 4 2 100 100 100 100 100 100 ASK ALL: Q.3 In general, how well do you think the U.S. government is doing in reducing the threat of terrorism? [READ] Oct 10-14 2001 38 Very well 48 46 Fairly well 40 9 Not too well 6 4 Not at all well 2 3 Don't know/Refused 4 100 100 Q.4 How should the U.S. determine its policy with regard to the war on terrorism? Should it be based mostly on the national interests of the U.S., or should it strongly take into account the interests of its allies? Early Sept 2001 30 U.S. national interests 38 59 Interests and views of allies 48 7 Both (VOL) 7 * Neither (VOL) 1 4 Don't Know/Refused 6 100 100 Q.5F1/ Q.6F2 As I read a list of possible LONG-RANGE foreign policy goals which the United States might have, tell me how much priority you think each should be given. First, [READ AND ROTATE], do you think this should have top priority, some priority, or no priority at all: Top Some No Q.5F1/Q.6F2 ITEM [N=1,281]: Priority Priority Priority DK/Ref 5F1d/ 6F2a. Taking measures to protect the U.S. from terrorist attacks 93 6 * 1=100 Early September, 2001 80 16 3 1=100 Q.5F1 ITEMS ONLY [N=638]: 5F1a. Preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction 81 14 2 3=100 Early September, 2001 78 16 5 1=100 September, 1997 70 23 6 1=100 June, 1995 68 21 9 2=100 September, 1993 69 24 5 1=100 5F1b. Insuring adequate energy supplies for the U.S. 69 29 1 1=100 Early September, 2001 74 23 2 1=100 September, 1997 58 36 3 3=100 June, 1995 59 34 3 4=100 September, 1993 60 34 4 2=100 5F1c. Promoting democracy in other nations 24 61 12 3=100 Early September, 2001 29 52 16 3=100 September, 1997 22 57 18 3=100 June, 1995 16 57 24 3=100 September, 1993 22 52 24 2=100 5F1e. Promoting U.S. business and economic interests abroad 30 63 4 3=100 Early September, 2001 37 53 8 2=100 September, 1997 16 62 20 2=100 June, 1995 26 50 20 4=100 September, 1993 27 51 19 3=100 5F1f. Strengthening the United Nations 46 46 7 1=100 Early September, 2001 42 43 13 2=100 September, 1997 30 53 14 3=100 June, 1995 36 45 17 2=100 September, 1993 41 46 11 2=100 5F1g. Reducing the spread of AIDS and other infectious diseases 59 38 2 1=100 Early September, 2001 73 23 3 1=100 5F1h. Protecting groups or nations that are threatened with genocide 48 43 3 6=100 Early September, 2001 49 41 5 5=100 Q.6F2 ITEMS ONLY [N=643]: 6F2b. Helping improve the living standards in developing nations 20 67 12 1=100 Early September, 2001 25 61 12 2=100 September, 1997 23 63 13 1=100 June, 1995 16 59 22 3=100 September, 1993 19 60 20 1=100 6F2c. Protecting the jobs of American workers 74 24 1 1=100 Early September, 2001 77 19 3 1=100 September, 1997 77 20 2 1=100 June, 1995 80 17 2 1=100 September, 1993 85 13 2 *=100 6F2d. Promoting and defending human rights in other countries 27 61 10 2=100 Early September, 2001 29 54 14 3=100 September, 1997 27 56 15 2=100 June, 1995 21 56 20 3=100 September, 1993 22 54 22 2=100 6F2e. Combating international drug trafficking 55 38 5 2=100 Early September, 2001 64 26 9 1=100 September, 1997 67 24 7 2=100 6F2f. Getting other countries to assume more of the costs of maintaining world order 54 41 3 2=100 Early September, 2001 56 35 6 3=100 6F2g. Dealing with the problem of world hunger 34 59 6 1=100 Early September, 2001 47 44 7 2=100 6F2h. Dealing with global warming 31 51 13 5=100 Early September, 2001 44 39 12 5=100 September, 1997 50 42 6 2=100 June, 1995 56 36 6 2=100 September, 1993 56 37 6 1=100 NO Q.7 OR Q.8 ASK ALL: Q.9 Do you think that we should increase our spending on national defense, keep it about the same, or cut it back? Early RV's 10- 10- 10- Sept Sept Aug June Sept Feb 10/ Sept 11/ 11/ 11/ 11/ 12/ 2001 2000 1999 1999 1997 1995 94+ 1993 90+ 86+ 82+ 78+ 74+ 50 Increase 32 34 27 31 17 19 18 10 12 21 22 32 13 41 Keep same 44 48 54 47 57 56 53 52 53 55 52 45 47 7 Cut back 20 14 16 19 24 24 26 36 32 23 24 16 33 2 DK/Ref. 4 4 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 3 3 7 8 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 + Chicago Council on Foreign Relations Q.10 In the dispute between Israel and the Palestinians, which side do you sympathize with more, Israel or the Palestinians? Early Chicago Council on Foreign Relations Sept Sept Sept Oct-Nov Oct-Nov Nov 2001 1997 1993 1990 1982 1978 47 Israel 40 48 45 34 41 39 10 Palestinians 17 13 21 13 17 12 8 Both (VOL) 6 5 3 7 8 8 18 Neither (VOL) 23 16 18 26 19 15 17 Don't know/Refused 14 18 12 20 16 13 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ASK FORM 1 ONLY [N=638]: Q.11 Thinking about the financial aid the United States provides Israel for military purposes, do you think U.S. military aid to Israel should be increased, kept the same, or decreased? ------- Gallup ------- Sept 2001 July 1999 10 Increased 16 10 56 Kept the same 47 42 25 Decreased 31 44 9 Don't know/Refused 6 4 100 100 100 ASK FORM 2 ONLY [N=643]: Q.12 Thinking about the Mideast situation these days, do you think the U.S. should take Israel's side more, less or about as much as it has in the past? 16 More 19 Less 56 As much as in the past 9 Don't know/Refused 100 ASK ALL: Q.13 Do you think the U.S. should put into effect a national missile defense system, or don't you think so? IF 1 "YES" IN Q.13 ASK: Q.14 Do we have a pressing need for this system right now or is this something we should put off into the future? Early Sept May Feb 2001 2001 2001 Yes, U.S. should put into effect a 64 national missile defense system 56 51 54 49 Need the system right now 35 29 n/a 14 Should put it off into the future 19 19 n/a 1 Don't know/Refused 2 3 n/a 26 No, U.S. should not 35 38 32 10 Don't know/Refused 9 11 14 100 100 100 100 ASK ALL: In your view, Q.15 How well is the MILITARY effort to destroy the terrorist groups going? [READ] Oct 10-14 2001 38 Very well 45 45 Fairly well 35 9 Not too well 6 2 Not at all well 4 6 Don't know/Refused 10 100 100 Q.16 How would you rate the job the government is doing in BUILDING DEFENSES at home to prevent future terrorist attacks? Would you say the government is doing an excellent job, a good job, only a fair job, or a poor job? [READ] Oct 10-14 2001 18 Excellent 20 51 Good 47 22 Only fair 22 5 Poor 4 4 Don't know/Refused 7 100 100 Q.17 If you had to choose, what should get a higher priority now? [READ AND ROTATE] Oct Late 10-14 Sept 2001 2001 37 Building our defenses at home to prevent future terrorist attacks 36 33 -OR-- 48 Taking military action to destroy terrorist networks around the world 45 44 13 Both (VOL) 13 16 2 Don't know/Refused 6 7 100 100 100 Q.18 How worried are you that there will soon be another terrorist attack in the United States? [READ] Oct 10-14 Early Oct 2001 2001 29 Very worried 27 28 42 Somewhat worried 40 45 18 Not too worried 19 15 10 Not at all worried 12 11 1 Don't know/Refused 2 1 100 100 100 Q.19 As of today, do you feel that your life [READ] Newsweek 9/27-28/01 41 Has returned to normal 40 31 Is BEGINNING to return to normal 35 8 Still hasn't begun to return to normal 7 17 Will NEVER return to normal? 15 3 Don't know/Refused 3 100 100 Q.20 In the long run, what is the best way for the U.S. to avoid problems like terrorism? Should the U.S.: [READ AND ROTATE] 61 Be very much involved in solving international problems? --OR-- 32 Not get too involved with international problems? 7 Don't know/Refused 100 Q.21 Do you think the terrorist attacks are the start of a major conflict between the people of America and Europe versus the people of Islam, or is it only a conflict with a small, radical group? 28 Major conflict 63 Conflict with a radical group 9 Don't know/Refused |