- (1) Party Name and Code Number
- Guatemalan National Democratic Movement,
441
- Movimiento Democratico Nacional,
MDN
- (2) Information Base and
Researchers
- The information base on party politics in
Guatemala consists of 1,687 pages from 79 documents, 14 of which
are in Spanish. Only 139 pages or 13 percent pertain specifically
to the MDN.
- Janet Benshoof indexed the literature for
retrieval.
- Doreen Ellis coded the
variables.
- 1.01 Year of Origin and 1.02 Name
Changes
- 1955, AC8
- 0, AC8
- The Movimiento Democratico Nacional was
formed in November , 1955, by Castillo Armas and his supporters.
It was the government party from 1955 to 1957, when Castillo Armas
was assassinated. Anti-communist sentiment, as a reaction to the
previous leftist regime of Arbenz, was its basic motivating force.
There was no evidence of any name changes throughout our time
period.
- 1.03 Organizational
Discontinuity
- 9, AC7
- The MDN was plagued by a series of splits
during the later half of our time period. The first split, from
which the Movimiento Liberacion Nacional developed, occurred in
late 1959. Dissident members, who claimed that the MDN
presidential candidate, Cruz Salazar, had "sold out" to the leader
of the Partido Reconciliacion Deomocratica Nacional through
certain pacts, left the MDN in protest of this action. The MLN
considered itself as a rightist opposition party to the
Ydigoras-PRDN government during the second half of our time
period. Within the congress, two MDN splits occurred. One split
led to the formation of the Partido Union Democratica, which
generally allied itself with the government coalition (i.e., the
PRDN and MDN) until it felt that it was unprofitable to do so.
Another group of eight MDN congressmen seceded from the party in
may, 1962, and became an independent, anti-government group. Their
secession was related to the decreasing importance and
profitability of the government coalition at that time. One source
states that the MDN split to form the PRDN and the MDN in the
congress of 1958. While the new PRDN members were probably past
members of the Castillo Armas coalition, this does not mean that
they were MDN members. (that author could also be describing an
alignment of MDN deputies into those supporting the Ydigoras-Cruz
Salazar pact and those remaining loyal to the MDN, alone.) There
is no other evidence that states that the PRDN was formed by the
MDN. However, there is the possibility that some individuals may
have defected from the MDN into the PRDN. This is not interpreted
as a group effort, and therefore not considered in this
code.
- 1.04 Leadership Competition
- 13, AC5
- Although two leadership changes occurred in
the MDN after 1950 ( Castillo Armas, the founder and first leader
of the party is not included in this number), there is no
substantial evidence as to the number of party members involved in
the designation of the new leader. The low adequacy-confidence
code reflects this lack of data. The leadership changes were coded
as occurring through a covert process because of one statement
about the secret debates preceeding Miguel Ortiz Passarelli's
nomination for president in 1957. There is no documentation of the
way in which Colonel Jose Luis Cruz Salazar was
chosen.
- 1.05 / 2.05 Legislative Instability and
Strength
- Instability is 1.01, AC6
- Strength is .36 for 1955-62,
AC6
- The MDN did not exist during the first part
of our time period. It was formed to contest the 1955
congressional elections as the "government" party. It won more
than 80 percent of the seats, but its legislative representation
declined consistently throughout our time period. The available
sources often differed considerably concerning the number of seats
that the MDN and other parties held in the 66 seat
congress.
- 1.06 / 2.06 Electoral Instability and
Strength
- Instability is 1.0, AC6
- Strength is .28 for 1957-62,
AC6
- Elections in Guatemala present a confusing
picture. Congressional elections appear to have been held in 1950,
1953, 1955, 1958, 1959, and 1961. In addition, an election to a
constituent assembly was held in 1954 but with all parties banned.
Congressional election data for elections prior to 1958, however,
do not exist in the file. Beginning with 1958, sources report
conflicting returns, and some of the parties ran occasionally in
coalitions. Therefore, we assessed electoral strength with
reference to the two presidential elections of 1950 and
1958--excluding the presidential referendum of 1954 and the
annulled election of 1957. The MDN did not exist to contest the
1950 election, but it won 28 percent of the vote in 1958, offering
Cruz Salazar as its candidate.
- 2.01 Government Discrimination
- 7 for 1955-62, AC5
- After the 1954 coup d'etat, Castillo Armas
formed the MDN as the government party. At this time, other anti
communist parties were allowed to develop, but these were all
pro-government in orientation. Their strength was kept minimal by
not allowing them to get sufficiently organized prior to the
December, 1955 election and by restricting their actions. The MDN
was the only party allowed any degree of freedom. In 1958,
Ydigoras Fuentes was elected. During his first few months in
office, he alternately harassed and tried to placate and ally with
the MDN. Ydigoras eventually entered into an electoral and
governmental alliance with Cruz Salazar, the leader of the
"colaboracionistas." This group seems to have received
governmental favors because they ran a common slate of candidates
with the government. Thus, they received money, use of government
supplies, vehicles and other government owned property, and
propaganda privileges. The splinter MLN which was in opposition to
the government received none of this.
- 2.02 Governmental Leadership
- 3 out of 8 for 1955-62, AC9
- The MDN was formed during the Castillo
Armas regime. It was the primary governmental party from the time
of its inception in 1955 through Castillo Armas' assassination.
From 1958 to 1962, Ydigoras Fuentes of the PRDN was president.
Although the MDN was often in coalition with the PRDN at that
time, the MDN cannot be considered as the governmental
party.
- 2.03 Cabinet Participation
- 6 out of 8 for 1955-62, AC5
- The MDN was in the cabinet during the
Castillo Armas regime. What cabinet posts Castillo Armas had were
probably all allotted to MDN members. With the advent of the
Ydigoras regime and the Ydigoras-Cruz Salazar pact, the years of
MDN participation in the cabinet become less clearly delineated.
As reported in the New York Times, the Ydigoras-Cruz pact stated
that Cruz would free his deputies' votes in the congressional
decision on the presidency in 1959 and pro-Cruz groups would get
at least three ministries plus other patronage, would have
guaranteed political freedom, would have a national anti-communist
administration without the revolutionary party, and Cruz would get
an ambassadorship. It would thus appear that the two parties
shared the cabinet participation. The only problem with this
interpretation is that there is no substantial evidence stating
that MDN members were in the cabinet until 1960. There are also
statements describing the lack of a firm coalition between the
PRDN and the MDN, even in 1959. We have thus conservatively coded
the MDN as having participated in the cabinet for three years
(1960-1962) during the later part of our time period. This code
should be interpreted as meaning "at least three
years."
- 2.04 National Participation
- 6, AC7
- The MDN was a national party, but it ran
proportionately stronger in Guatemala City than in the central
region.
- 2.07 Outside Origin
- 1, AC9
- The MDN was founded by Castillo Armas in
1955. It became the governmental party for his regime.
- 5.01 Ownership of Means of
Production
- 3, AC3
- Besides the general information relating to
the MDN, one example in our data file implies that it advocated
private ownership of the means of production. This is the 1956
attempt by Castillo Armas to start a bank owned by farmers and
cattlemen who would supply the capital necessary to develop
private farm projects and speed mechanization.
- 5.02 Government Role in Economic
Planning
- 3, AC6
- One of Guatemala's main problems was an
underdeveloped economy that was often dominated by traditional
elites and United States investment. Castillo Armas felt that one
of the ways to solve this problem was through government planning.
He formed a council of economic planning to develop a five-year
plan "which covered public works, development of agriculture, the
Indian economy, light and power systems, and technical
coordination among various development organs." (Verner, p. 19)
two of the development organs were the bank for agricultural
development and the agency to set up rural colonies. Cruz Salazar
did not seem to desire such an intensive policy of economic
planning. Under Cruz the MDN supported plans for subsidization of
specific industries or portions of an industry (e.g., particular
agricultural products) in an effort to diversify the
economy.
- 5.03 Redistribution of Wealth
- 2, AC3
- During the Castillo Armas regime, an
agrarian reform law was approved that granted a land title to the
recipients of government lands with no resale possible for 25
years. Some land was distributed among the peasants, and Castillo
Armas appealed to companies (e.g., United Fruit) to give the
government its unused properties. His appeals were transformed
into a threat when the new agrarian reform law declared that idle
land could be expropriated if not put to use within two years, and
idle land was to be taxed. However, it is doubtful that the
redistribution and its laws were fully implemented. During the
Ydigoras Fuentes regime, the MDN stance on redistribution is not
clear. Being a member of the coalition government, the MDN at
least accepted a graduated income tax. Cruz Salazar also spoke of
desiring agrarian reform in a campaign speech. However, no further
information was found in the literature.
- 5.04 Social Welfare
- AC1
- No information.
- 5.05 Secularization of Society
- 0, AC4
- The Castillo Armas regime had a love-hate
relationship with the Catholic church. While accepting support
from clerical elements in Guatemala, the MDN did not allow the
church to regain its past political power. The constituent
assembly passed articles which restricted church support of
political parties, guaranteed religious freedom, provided for the
separation of church and state, did not permit catholic education
in public schools, and prohibited clerics from political office.
There is no information on the MDN policy during the Ydigoras
regime.
- 5.06 Support of the Military
- 5, AC7
- Castillo Armas, president of Guatemala and
founder of the MDN, was a colonel as was Cruz Salazar, MDN
presidential candidate in 1958. Castillo Armas expanded the police
force during his regime and used the army for control of
demonstrations and other social disorders. His regime depended
upon military support. There is no reason to believe that this
pro-military orientation of the MDN changed later, for the regime
with which the MDN was allied was also supported by the armed
forces.
- 5.07 Alignment With East-West
Blocs
- 5, AC9
- MDN leaders have continually favored the
United States and have, indeed, depended upon it. The Castillo
Armas invasion had United States aid and blessings, and the United
States continued to support his intensely anti communist regime.
Cruz Salazar was the United States' favorite for the presidency in
1958. The New York Times felt that this may have been the reason
for his loss. Both the MDN and the PRDN remained allies with the
United States during the second half of our time period through
unilateral arrangements and through multilateral organizations
like the OAS.
- 5.08 Anti-colonialism
- 3, AC4
- Castillo Armas had very close links with
the United States during his administration. One would thus expect
that this extended to the area of foreign investment. One example
is given of a law that would specifically aid foreign petroleum
interests. It is inferred that such legislation was commonly used
to encourage foreign investments. Later, there is only one
reference to the MDN orientation to foreign investment. In a
campaign speech, Cruz Salazar stated that there would be no change
in policy. However, he did not appear to encourage United States
investment, but rather to accept it.
- 5.09 Supranational Integration
- 3, AC6
- Castillo Armas changed the past policy of
the Arbenz regime toward Odeca, the Organization of Central
American States. Arbenz had left Odeca during a disagreement over
a policy issue. Castillo Armas re-entered the organization during
his presidency. It is assumed that the MDN also supported the
Central American Common Market during the Ydigoras regime as
Ydigoras promoted it, and his party was in alliance with the
MDN.
- 5.10 national integration
- AC1
- No information.
- 5.11 Electoral Participation
- 1, AC8
- The constitution of 1956, drafted by
Castillo Armas' supporters, created a secret ballot for literates
and an open ballot for illiterate males ( illiterate females were
not allowed to vote). An electoral law issued later made voting
compulsory for literate males and females over eighteen years of
age and optional for illiterate males.
- 5.12 Protection of Civil Rights
- 3, AC9
- MDN philosophy was a frantic
anti-communism, a reaction to the reformist Arbenz regime. During
the Castillo Armas regime, all leftists were restricted from
organizing, and past leaders were often arrested or exiled. The
Communist Party was barred from Guatemala by the 1956
constitution, whereas Ydigoras is said to have had a type of deal
with Mendez Montenegro, leader of the leftist-oriented PR. The MDN
entered neither national coalitions nor Guatemala City mayoral
electoral alliances with them.
- 5.13 Interference With Civil
Liberties
0, AC6
- One source states that Castillo Armas
allowed an oppositionist weekly to be published. Yet he also
prohibited the use of "political or undemocratic propaganda." This
contradiction was inherent in his policy which guaranteed civil
liberties except during extenuating circumstances.
- 5.14 / 5.15 US--Soviet Experts Left-Right
Ratings
- US says 1, conservative
- Soviets say 1, stands in a most extreme
reactionary anti-communist position.
- 6.00 Open Competition in the Electoral
Process
- 2.5, AC7
- The MDN was formed for the 1955 elections,
which were conducted under the Castillo Armas government following
his coup of 1954. The freedom of these elections is suspect, as
the MDN won more than 80 percent of the seats. In the
congressional elections of 1958, 1959, and 1961, however, the MDN
followed more of a competitive strategy, although it did form a
strong alliance with the PRDN in 1959 and a weaker one in
1961.
- 6.10 Restricting Party
Competition
- 1.5, AC7
- Castillo Armas can certainly be considered
to have maintained his executive position through the restriction
of political opposition. Naturally, those parties that were most
limited were the leftist parties and groups previously aligned
with the Arbenz regime. Even when he allowed the formation of
political parties, they were required to maintain a supportive
position towards the government. Thus, the new parties actually
cooperated rather than competed with Castillo Armas and the MDN,
as no true opposition existed. This was illustrated by Verner's
1956 cohesion index which characterized the whole legislature as
being highly cohesive. While out of the governmental leadership
during the second half of our time period, the MDN was more
oriented towards electoral competition. To retain as much power
and governmental support as possible during this time, the MDN
allied with the Ydigoras administration. The Ydigoras regime (and
thus the MDN) restricted competition by harassing opposition
leaders and voters. They also utilized government supplies,
vehicles, and money for their campaign, and local officials
generally supported the status quo to retain their privileged
position for patronage and money. Thus it can be said that the
party did restrict competition to some degree.
- 6.20 Subverting the Political
System
- 0, AC9
- The one chance that the MDN had to subvert
the political process was when Ortiz was named president in 1957.
Upon opposition pressure for his resignation because of alleged
electoral fraud, the MDN agreed to participate in new elections
rather than forcibly retain his position. The Castillo Armas coup
d'etat could be viewed as subversion of the political process,
however, the MDN was not in existence at that time.
- 6.30 Propagandizing Ideas and
Program
- AC1
- No information.
- 6.50 Providing for Welfare of Party
Members
- AC1
- No information.
- 7.01 Sources of Funds
- 6, AC9
- Government parties in Guatemala are
supported by government funds, patronage, and supplies. Thus, the
MDN received this type of government support during the Castillo
Armas regime. Although not the government party after 1958, the
MDN received government funds (especially during electoral
campaigns) because of its alliance with the PRDN. It should be
noted that much of the money which supported Castillo Armas and
Cruz Salazar as the 1958 presidental candidates was said to have
originally been from the United States. This is probably true, as
the United States supported Castillo's anti-communist regime.
However, this aid would have been disbursed to the Guatemalan
government rather than to the party itself.
- 7.02 Source of Members
- AC1
- No information.
- 7.03 sources of leaders
- 2 (sectors 03, 07), AC4
- John Sloan stated that "the electoral game
is primarily played by professional people--lawyers, military men,
doctors, and teachers." (p. 228) these party leaders generally
live in Guatemala City. However, there is no evidence that these
leaders are the MDN parliamentary candidates, although this could
possibly be their status as there are no residency requirements
for representing a department. The low adequacy-confidence code
reflects the inconclusiveness of the literature.
- 7.04 Relations With Domestic
Parties
- 5, AC7
- The MDN was the governmental party during
the Castillo Armas regime. As such it did not have need to form
alliances with other parties, Castillo only allowed the existence
of those parties which supported him. Thus all the parties tended
to agree in the legislature and to follow a similar ideology of
anti-communism. When the MDN lost the governmental leadership, it
allied with the PRDN to retain government support. As this
alliance included cabinet responsibilities, it is inferred that
the MDN had some dependence on the PRDN. This code best
illustrates the general relationship between the two parties.
However, there were certain times when the MDN could be considered
highly dependent on the PRDN, especially between 1959 and 1961. In
1961 and 1962, there was a growing independence of the MDN from
the PRDN in all areas of their alliance, as manifested by the
withdrawal of parliamentary members from the pro government
majority and Ydigoras' increasing dependence on the military. Thus
the code shows the average orientation of the MDN.
- 7.05 Relations With Foreign
Organizations
- 5, AC5
- Although there is no information on this
subject, it is inferred from the general data that the MDN was
autonomous of international relationships. The MDN was very
nationalistic and was against other parties with international
affiliations, i.e., the communist party in the Guatemalan
case.
- 8.01 Structural Articulation
- 4, AC3
- From vague references, it can be inferred
that the MDN had at least two national organs. There was a
national convention and some other type of meeting of party
leaders, probably either an executive committee or a parliamentary
members' meeting. Both of these organs are only mentioned in
passing statements, and there is therefore no information about
their responsibilities and the selection of their
members.
- 8.02 Intensiveness of
Organization
- 3, AC3
- Although one source refers to the "local
branches of political parties ," it does not appear that the MDN
was organized on any more intensive level than a county basis. The
Guatemalan political parties were notorious for their lack of
organization and thus would not be expected to have local units
representing small spatial areas.
- 8.03 Extensiveness of
Organization
- AC1
- It is probable that all parties were most
completely organized in the areas surrounding Guatemala City.
However, there is no evidence for this suggestion.
- 8.04 Frequency of Local
Meetings
- AC1
- No information.
- 8.05 Frequency of National
Meetings
- AC1
- No information.
- 8.06 Maintaining Records
- 5, AC3
- The MDN published party propaganda during
elections. There appeared to be some type of membership lists
because the parties needed a certain number of signatures to be
legally registered. There is no other indication that the lists
were maintained, and they were thus inferred to be
inaccurate.
- 8.07 Pervasiveness of
Organization
- 0, AC5
- Since the MDN itself was an amorphous
entity, it could not expected to have organized socio-economic
sectors, although there is no information supporting this
assumption. In fact, during the Castillo Armas regime there was a
widespread dissolution of organized sectors, i.e., labor,
campesino groups, in reaction to the previous Arbenz
regime.
- 9.01 Nationalization of
Structure
- AC1
- No information.
- 9.02 Selecting the National
Leader
- AC2
- Castillo Armas founded the MDN and remained
its leader until his assassination in 1957. After this point, the
information relating to the national leadership is very vague.
Statements about the selection process range on the one hand from
a reference to the candidate being chosen by the party or some
kind of nomination occurring to the other hand where there is a
portrayal of the candidate announcing his candidacy with party
support or the party seen as a collection of supporters for a
self-chosen caudillo. Because these are only impressions received
from passing references, we cannot determine who selected the MDN
national leader.
- 9.03 Selecting Parliamentary
Candidates
- AC1
- There is one reference to a problem that
the ruling Ydigoras coalition had in deciding which candidates
from which party should represent the coalition. There is no
information as to what group resolved the problem, nor is there
any other information relating to this variable.
- 9.04 Allocating Funds
- AC1
- The governmental parties received financial
support from public funds. However, there is no information
stating either where these monies were gathered (at all levels or
at one level) or information about their distribution, if any,
between levels.
- 9.05 Formulating Policy
- 7, AC3
- A general statement by John Sloan about the
autocratic control of Guatemalan parties by their top leadership
seems to be illustrated in the case of the MDN. Castillo tightly
controlled party members, including congressional deputies. Thus
his policy appears to have been party policy. Later, Cruz Salazar
committed the MDN to an electoral pact with the PRDN without
consulting party members or leaders. He remained the MDN chief
through Ydigoras' support. These two examples suggest that MDN
policy was formulated by a specific leader, although this
information is not really sufficient for a confident code. There
is also discussion of meetings of leaders during times of crisis
(e.g., Castillo's assassination) that may also have had policy
making functions.
- 9.06 Controlling Communications
- AC1
- Although there is mention of the
distribution of propaganda during elections, there is no
information as to the structural level of its control.
- 9.07 Administering Discipline
- 4, AC5
- Castillo Armas may have administered
discipline to the MDN ranks in order to maintain their cohesion.
Afterwards, it appears that a leadership clique administered the
discipline. This was evidenced in the attempted purge of Cruz
Salazar.
- 9.08 Leadership Concentration
- 6, AC5
- Initially, the MDN leadership was exercised
by Castillo Armas, the party founder and president of Guatemala.
After his assassination, Ortiz became the presidential candidate
and was proclaimed president by the MDN. His presidency was later
rescinded due to attacks by other parties alleging the fraudulent
nature of the elections. Cruz Salazar became the new candidate.
Ydigoras won the plurality of votes and Cruz released the deputies
in the congressional decision on the election. A group of MDN
leaders opposed this and later actions that Cruz took without
their consultation to align the MDN with the PRDN. These other
leaders split from the MDN. Thus, Cruz appears to have been the
individual who exercised leadership over the MDN. It is possible
that he was aided by a clique of supporters because there had been
an opposition clique. However, no information in the literature
substantiates this possibility.
- 10.01 Legislative Cohesion
- .65, AC4
- The MDN was probably completely cohesive
under Castillo Armas' control. The control that Castillo Armas had
over the MDN blocs affected the independence of congress. (Verner,
1968) in fact, the entire legislature (MDN plus other
pro-government groups) was highly cohesive. Verner computed its
index of dissent and found that the average dissent index was
about twenty percent. It can thus be inferred with some degree of
certainty that the MDN itself was completely cohesive. After 1958,
the MDN experienced a weakening of party cohesiveness as various
leaders or cliques tried to gain control of the party. MDN
deputies dissented from the Cruz decision to support Ydigoras for
the presidency, for example. This later led to the MLN split. A
group of MDN deputies also reorganized with some PRDN deputies,
becoming the PUD. It can be expected that these divisions were
illustrated in the party's cohesiveness in the
legislature.
- 10.02 Ideological Factionalism
- 0, AC5
- There is no indication of an ideology that
binds the MDN together. Castillo's efforts to formulate a
philosophy failed and the only remaining unifying force was
anti-communism. All party members subscribed to this
orientation.
- 10.03 Issue Factionalism
- 4 for 1958-62, AC5
- Under Castillo Armas' control, the MDN was
not divided by different orientations towards political issues.
However, during the Ydigoras regime, both the MLN and the PUD were
formed. The MLN split due to Cruz Salazar's unilateral alliance of
the MDN with the PRDN. There is no specific reason given why some
MDN deputies joined the PUD, but the PUD was said to represent a
new orientation in the congress. This can possibly be interpreted
as regarding various issues. Lack of information about the size of
these factions is reflected in the adequacy-confidence code. It is
interesting to note, however, that ere MLN survived this period
whereas the MDN did not. But this information cannot be
incorporated into a quantitative estimate of strength because
later MLN success may have developed from an initially very small
faction.
- 10.04 Leadership Factionalism
- 2, AC5
- Although one source commented that
Guatemalan parties have been divided by leadership conflicts, it
does not seem that the MDN experienced factionalism based on the
personal attraction of various leaders. Cliques may have
conflicted or various groups may have attempted to control the
party, but they were not composed of a leader and his
personalistic following.
- 10.05 Strategic or Tactical
Factionalism
- 4 for 1958-62, AC5
- The MLN opposed the Cruz alignment of the
MDN with the PRDN. This may be considered a disagreement over the
basic tactic of whether to support or oppose the present regime.
Again, the membership of the faction is not discussed and is
reflected in a lower adequacy-confidence code.
- 10.06 Party Purges
- 0, AC8
- Although the party tried to purge Cruz
Salazar for his personal alignment of the MDN with the PRDN, he
managed to remain a party member because a legal requirement for
purges was not met. There is no other evidence of a purge or an
attempted purge during our time period.
- 11.01 Membership Requirements
- AC1
- No information.
- 11.02 Membership Participation
- AC1
- No information.
- 11.03 Material Incentives
- 4, AC5
- Guatemalan parties reflect the opportunism
of their militants. They generally lack ideology and binding
programs. The party purpose is to promote a group of men to places
of power and control of patronage and funds. The incentive for MDN
militants during our entire time period was material in nature.
Castillo Armas controlled the national resources, and later Cruz
received a portion which he could then mete out as he desired.
Cruz maintained his position of prominence in the party (rather
than being purged by disaffected party members) because of his
control of material benefits.
- 11.04 Purposive Incentives
- 0, AC3
- The lack of ideology also relates to this
variable. Although Castillo Armas was an unmitigated
anti-communist, it cannot be said that he or his supporters were
motivated to support the party for the purpose of ridding the
country of communism. The MDN militants were generally motivated
by material incentives.
- 11.05 Doctrinism
- 0, AC9
- The lack of ideology of the MDN would also
mean a lack of doctrine. Castillo Armas made the only attempt at
developing an ideology. It was called the new life. However, this
philosophy was not utilized because it did not attract support for
the MDN. Castillo Armas' "liberation" continued without a
doctrine, and after his assassination there was no further attempt
to develop one.
- 11.06 Personalism
- 0, AC5
- Castillo Armas did not appear to have
exercised charismatic control over the MDN. His personal control
was through patronage. This was also true of the later MDN
leaders, for one source states that Cruz Salazar retained his
power through patronage given to him by Ydigoras.