ID Code	Party Name	No. of Pages in Party File	% of Pages in Country File[1]
1	American Democratic Party[2]	-	-
2	American Republican Party[2]	-	-
11	British Labour Party[2]	-	-
12	British Conservative Party[2]	-	-
21	Australian Conservative Party	1353	45%
22	Australian Liberal Party	1211	40
23	Australian Country Party	1059	35
31	New Zealand National Party	809	52
32	New Zealand Labour Party	965	63
41	Canadian Conservative Party[2]	-	-
42	Canadian Liberal Party[2]	-	-
43	Canadian Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (New Democratic Party)[2]	-	-
44	Canadian Social Credit Party[2]	-	-
51	Irish Fianna Fail	254	31
52	Irish Fine Gael	157	19
53	Irish Labour Party	109	13
71	Rhodesian & Nyasaland United Federal Party	900	39
72	Rhodesian & Nyasaland Confederate/Dominion Party	396	17
73	Northern Rhodesian African National Congress	317	14
74	Malawi (Nyasaland) Congress Party	374	16
81	Indian National Congress	1978	43
82	Indian Communist Party	1302	28
101	Austrian People's Party	827	47
102	Austrian Socialist Party	1136	65
103	Austrian Freedom or Liberal Party (League of Independence)	306	18
111	French Popular Republican Movement	612	22
112	French Radical Socialist Party	710	25
113	French Socialist Party	738	26
114	French Gaullist Party	681	24
115	French Communist Party	842	30
121	West German Christian Democratic Union	756	36
122	West German Social Democratic Party	850	40
123	West German Free Democrat Party	629	30
141	Greek Liberal Party	112	22
142	Greek National Progressive Union of Center	82	16
143	Greek Rally/National Radical Union	150	29
145	Greek United Democratic Left	98	19
171	Portuguese National Union	725	63
201	Danish Social Democratic Party	404	34
202	Danish Moderate Liberal Party (Venstre)	266	22

---

¹The percentage is obtained by dividing the number of pages indexed for a party by the total number of pages in the file for that country. When summed across all the parties in a given country, the percentages may total to more than 100 because more than one party can be discussed on the same page. As discussed in the text, the literature on parties in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada was not organized into files and indexed in the systematic fashion as the literature for parties in the other countries.

²The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada were not drawn for the study, and we did not build information files for them. Instead, their parties were coded by judges using more conventional library research methods.

go to page 9